Technical

WHAT MAKES THE POE DIFFERENT?

FOUNDATIONAL

Map, pin point, and track the underlying factors that affect equality
Applicable across many contexts (Public, Private, & Humanitarian Sectors)
Causal instead of effectual
Anything equality

UNIFIED

Logically
Structurally
Mathematically

ARCHITECTURE

Stable
Update-able
Extensible
Malleable
Flexible
Uniformed

RESEARCH READY

Prime Thesis
Sub Theses
Testable Hypotheses

INSTANCE OF SOW AND REAP (INOSAR)

An Instance of Sow And Reap (INOSARs) is the emanation of a group of circumstances that affect the process of sow and reap. Subsequently, this will affect equality. INOSARs possess the majority of and potentially, all equality related details directly connected to a particular circumstance. Enabling the successful observation of a particular process of sow and reap from emanation, to either actualization or termination.

How!? Each instance includes the entire Map Of Equality Constructs (MOEC). Therefore, every Instance of Sow And Reap (INOSAR) can within itself, successfully map all equality related factors and variables associated with its own unique iteration. Thus, each Instance of Sow And Reap can provide substantial details about the interaction of its inherent constructs. Potentially, creating a detailed information repository of a particular circumstance. Thanks to the design of INOSARs and the MOEC, equality related circumstances can be detected at inception, thoroughly articulated, indexed, quantified, and converted into actionable protocols that:

Achieve equality, or as the POE describes it; actualization of sow and reap.
Reverse and prevent inequality, or as the POE describes it; termination of the hindrances of sow and reap.

To reiterate, INOSARs enable the successful observation of a particular process of sow and reap from emanation, to either actualization or termination. This oversees both the commencement or termination of equality or inequality. Instances of Sow And Reap are a foundational component of the Protocols of Equal, and perhaps a vital contribution to the advancement of equality.

THE MAP OF EQUALITY CONSTRUCTS (MOEC)

The Map Of Equality Constructs (MOEC) is a component of the POE framework. The MOEC maps the underlying factors that affect equality. By pinpointing these factors and their associated variables, a clear picture of equality is formed with detailed comprehension. A critical component required for the interconnection of equality constructs. The MOEC renders equality as foundational, structured, and now quantifiable. This transforms equality from overarching nostalgic pursuits, into quantifiable processes. Ones that can give rise to protocols that produce actionable insights with measurable results.

The MOEC provides a foundational basis to underwrite equality across many contexts. It strives to quantify all possible aspects that affect equality with enough precision to form equations without any remainders. Although this is a highly ambitious aspiration, it is one that is attainable. The MOEC validates the Protocols Of Equal as a logically unified and mathematically consistent framework. Thus, making the POE an equated model.

ASCENDING & DESCENDING EQUALITY CONSTRUCTS

Every INOSAR has Ascending Constructs and Descending Constructs. Ascending Sow And Reap Constructs (ASARCs) are progressions that aspire towards the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR). Descending Sow And Reap Constructs (DSARCs) are regressions that deviate from the ROSAR. To make it simple, Ascending Constructs progress towards achieving equality while simultaneously desisting and potentially terminating inequality. In contrast, Descending Constructs are regressing away from equality while simultaneously assisting an potentially perpetuating inequality. It’s possible that every INOSAR is either in a state of ascent, or descent, that is until it is actively reversed or prevented.

The reason why the POE Framework is an equated model is that both Ascending & Descending constructs have the exact same Base Sow And Reap Constructs (BSARCs). Thus, every Ascending Sow And Reap Construct has an opposing Descending Sow And Reap Construct. However, while they have the same operational objective, they have opposing aspirations and subsequently directional flow. The following chart explains the basics of the architecture.

BASE SOW AND REAP CONSTRUCTS (BSARCs)	ASCENDING SOW AND REAP CONSTRUCTS (ASARCs) ⬆️	DESCENDING SOW AND REAP CONSTRUCTS (DSARCs) ⬇️
CONDUITS A carrier of sow and reap or the lack of it. They may not be the cause, however, they are the median that enables inequality to be manifested. Conduits can be seen as the server of circumstances associated with sow and reap.	Conduits of Equality (COEQ) Carriers of equality circumstances.	Conduits of Inequality (COI) Carriers of inequality circumstances.
OCCURRENCES All occurrences require a Conduit to ‘occur’. An occurrence is a manifested incident of sow and reap. Occurrences have several inherent components such as: experiences, perpetuators, defenders, reversals, and prevention.	Occurrences of Equality (OCOEQ) Composed of experiences, perpetuators, and defenders of equality.	Occurrences of Inequality (OCOEQ) Composed of experiences, perpetuators, and defenders of inequality.
PRINCIPLES Foundational component of an observed phenomena that interact with, and potentially affect the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR). ‘The Links’, on the chains of equality or inequality.	Clauses: Binding factors of sow and reap.	Deviates: Unbinding factors of sow and reap.
APEX (Point / Sequence) The destination point of a conduit or occurrence of sow and reap. Conversely, the terminal point of its opposing ideology.	Apex of Equality (APEQ) Highest point of equality, and consequently the terminal point of inequality.	Apex of Inequality (APOI) Lowest point of inequality, and consequently the terminal point of equality.
BREAKING POINT (Point / Sequence) The specific point where the cessation of the directional flow towards the Apex Point of an Ascending or Descending Sow And Reap Construct. Thus, ‘Broken’.	Breaking Point of Equality (APEQ) The specific point where the directional flow towards the Apex of equality has stopped. Thus, Broken. There is often a reason for this. Usually accompanied by a corresponding sequence.	Breaking Point of Inequality (APOI) The specific point where the directional flow towards the Apex of inequality has stopped. Thus, Broken. There is often a reason for this. Usually accompanied by a corresponding sequence.
REVELATION (Point / Sequence) A point where causes and potentially supporters of a conduit or occurrence are revealed. Variable Point	Revelations of Equality (RevelOEQ) Causes and supporters of equality are revealed.	Revelations of Inequality (RevelOI) Causes and supporters of inequality are revealed.
REVERSAL (Point / Sequence) The reversal of the directional flow of an Ascending or Descending Sow And Reap Construct. Variable Point	Reversal of Equality (ReverOEQ) Cessation of ascending towards the apex of equality, and consequently the commencement of descending towards inequality.	Reversal of Inequality (ReverOI) Cessation of descending towards the apex of inequality, and consequently the commencement of ascending towards equality.
SEQUENCES The integral formation of multiple interrelated principles that contribute to the manifestation of a construct of sow and reap. ‘The Chains’	Sequences of Equality (SOEQs) ‘Chains of Equality’: Whereby each principle is a link of equality.	Sequences of Inequality (SOI) ‘Chains of Inequality’: Whereby each principle is a link of inequality.

CONDUITS (Macro Constructs)

A carrier of sow and reap or the lack of it. They may not be the cause, however, they are the median that enables inequality to be manifested. Conduits can be seen as the server of circumstances associated with sow and reap.

Example Conduits:

Sentiment (Love or Hate etc.)
Money (Equitable or non equitable etc.)
Collective Identity (Gender, racial, ethnics, cultural etc.)
Community (Inclusive or exclusive etc.)
Arms (Moral or immoral etc.)
Leadership (Liberty or Oppression etc.)
Integrity (Ethical, Non Ethical etc.)
Legislation (Just or unjust etc.)
Healthcare (Equitable or non equitable etc.)
Cohesion (Unity or lack of unity etc.)
Negligence (Intentional or non intentional)

OCCURRENCES (Meso Constructs)

All occurrences require a Conduit to ‘occur’. An occurrence is a manifested incident of sow and reap. Occurrences have several inherent components such as: experiences, perpetuators, defenders, reversals, and prevention.

Example Occurrences:

Pay inequality
Racial inequality
Social alienation
Unequal access to health benefits
Unjust legislation
Immoral enforcement

PRINCIPLES (Micro Constructs)

Principles are foundational components of an observed phenomena associated with the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR). This phenomena can be conduits or occurrences. As a part of the Map Of Equality Constructs (MOEC), principles (micro components) explain how and why the conduits (macro components), and occurrences (meso components) manifest. Principles are what make the Protocols of Equal stand out from other frameworks as they enable an intricate ability to comprehend, communicate, and modify the underlying factors that affect sow and reap.

Principles are effective individually. However, when utilized together they possess a
substantial ability to map and track the underlying factors and variables that affect equality.
The insight and comprehension of this micro yet foundational scope, renders the correlations of the observable phenomena, circumstances, occurrences, and conduits. Principles enable the POE to form a clear picture of a particular Instance of Sow And Reap (INOSAR). As a result, actionable protocols can be formulated to detect, diagnose, index, reverse, and prevent inequalities. Optionally, actionable protocols can be formulated to improve the processes required to achieve an extremely high level of equality.

FACETS OF PRINCIPLES

CAUSES & EFFECTS

Causes: Factors that produce the observed phenomena.
Effects: The results of the observed phenomena.

PROBLEM & SOLUTIONS

Problems: Issues related to the observed phenomena.
Solutions: Remedy for issues related to observed phenomena.

APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS

Application: Methods to apply the observed phenomena.
Limitation: The constraints of the observed phenomena.

FACTORS OF PRINCIPLES:

Binding Factors (Clauses)

Aspects of principles that provisions & promotes the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR).
Champions and upkeep the progress towards the apex of equality.
Combat deviates and consequently prevent non binding factors from hindering the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR).
Produce proactive actionable protocols (stipulations, provisions, specifications etc)

Unbinding Factors (Deviates)

Components of principles that hinders or facilitates the hindrance of the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR).
Potentially, a reliable method to detect & diagnose inequality.
Reversing and preventing inequality requires nullifying the deviate(s) involved.

Neutral Factors (Neutralizers)

Components of principles that can bind or deviate the ROSAR depending on its application.

Read some of the principles to better understand how intricate they are individually. Then, assess how much more effective they are when cross referenced and paired with other correlated principles to form sequences that lead to occurrences or conduits related to equality or inequality.

SEQUENCES

The integral formation of multiple interrelated principles that contribute to the manifestation of a construct of sow and reap. This includes conduits, occurrences, apex, revelation, and reversal. Sequences are ‘the chains’ while principles are the links on those chains. They reveal much data about the reasons why a particular circumstance of sow and reap has manifested. Sequences provide detailed intricate information surrounding the manifestation of a sow and reap circumstance.

At the Protocols of Equal institute we have observed the majority of equality related matters have an associated sequence. Usually, this includes a succession of multiple principles (observed phenomena). This demonstrates circumstances relating to equality are usually the result of a process, as opposed to a singular event; frequently assessed as random. Sequences are the “Chains” of this process, while Principles are the “Links” on the chains. Often times there are multiple sequences involved in an equality related circumstance. For instance, there could be a Sequence for occurrences, and one for conduits. Correspondingly, there would correlated Sequences for experiences, reversals and prevention.

ARCHITECTURE

The advanced architecture of Protocols of Equal enables it to account for all matters relating to equality via one coherent structure. The core components of the POE can be substituted by variables. For example, variable placeholders can be used for conduits of equality, and their occurrences. Empowering the POE to account for and quantify nearly every conduit, or occurrence that could ever be associated with equality or inequality, with the same formula.

The ability to exchange the constructs of equality with variables provides a mathematical, and potentially empirical basis. Making it possible to form complex data driven models required for advanced mathematical computations. A benefit that will yield thorough statistics. As a result, equipping the Protocols Of Equal to extract vital foundational information from the same logically unified and mathematically consistent framework.

Increasing the capability to gather and compare equality related data from the same foundational framework, enhances comprehension, and subsequently proficiency of application. Thus, transforming equality from overarching nostalgic pursuits into quantifiable constructs of equality. Accordingly, giving rise to actionable protocols that can detect, diagnose, reverse and prevent inequalities. This dynamic architecture makes the Protocols Of Equal a truly powerful and comprehensive equality framework.

EQUALITY HAS A CONSTANT

At the Protocols of the Equal Institute equality is observed as having a foundational constant, the ROSAR. It is at the very micro foundations of every equal related interaction. This same constant (The ROSAR), is scalable from micro foundations to macro universal applications. Based on the observations of the POE, the vast majority of inequalities, and potentially all inequalities, occur due to the breaking of the The Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR). This provides a strong argument for the ROSAR as a foundational constant. The ROSAR gives rise to equality constructs that enable the POE to detect the Breaking Point Of Equality (BPOEQ), and provide methods to reverse the resulting inequities. In addition, the POE recommends strategies to prevent the occurrence of potential inequalities. Thus, the ROSAR is considered a universal constant and the defining aspect of “equal” and its dependent concepts such as equality and equity.

QUANTIFIABLE PARAMETERS & METRICS

The Map Of Equality Constructs (MOEC) provides parameters for the underlying factors and variables that affect equality. These parameters make equality quantifiable. This enables the extraction of relevant metrics that pertains to the interactions of equality constructs, their underlying factors, and associated variables. Complex equality driven data models are now possible. Ideally, this will provide detailed statistics that will eventually yield measurable equality outcomes. For example, a reliable system that accurately measures equality we call, the “Equality Quotient”. Quantifiable parameters and metrics provided by the Protocols Of Equal will produce methods that are of high value within the emerging landscape of a society driven by equality and human rights.

ACTIONABLE PROTOCOLS

As the MOEC transforms equality from overarching nostalgic pursuits into constructs of equality that can be audited and enforced.. Each construct has underlying factors and variables. Comprehension of how these constructs interact enables the formation of actionable protocols. Ones that can navigate the intricacies of the underlying factors and variables that affect equality. The result is a newly created ability to ‘map, pinpoint, and track’ the causes and effects of the underlying factors and variables that affect equality at revealing depths. As a result, yielding new methods to approach equality within society. This includes the ability to detect, reverse and prevent previously untraceable inequities. The goal is to utilize these actionable protocols to significantly reduce inequalities, and achieve Extremely High Level Equality (EHLEQ).

EMPIRICAL BASIS

Let’s take a look into the empirical basis of the Protocols of Equal framework, and its Elegant architecture that makes the intricate application of equality efficient yet dynamic. A pioneering, foundational, reliable, and stable basis that unifies equality under one scalable framework. How?

The Protocols of Equal is constructed from strong morally driven axioms. Ones that are foundational, extensible and scalable. This provides unified and highly interoperable internal components that are potentially scalable to universal proportions. In addition, the underlying factors and variables that affect equality are based on observed phenomena that occur during the process of sow and reap.

The POE has multiple equality constructs. Each individual construct of equality has its own thesis, and corresponding hypothesis with their own testable arguments. All equality constructs are rooted by the same prime thesis, the Rule of Sow And Reap (ROSAR). Essentially, the ROSAR is the root, and each equality construct is a branch. Sharing the same root thesis interlinks each equality construct. Thus, together they form a complex group of interconnected theses. Therefore exhibiting the POE as a logically unified, and mathematically stable framework. Which is why it can be considered an “Equated Framework”.

This modular structure organizes and streamlines research of how each equality construct operates in relation to the prime thesis. In addition, the correlations of each equality construct and any variations that arise in applying the ROSAR, can be properly studied and accounted for. Equality constructs, and any of their inherent sub components can be updated, or entirely removed without affecting the root structure, and functionality of the POE framework.

These independently operating constructs enable a dynamic architecture. Empowering macro, meso, and micro components of the Protocols Of Equal to be utilized as a standalone framework, or an integrate-able framework via modular access points. More importantly, this universal adaptability could signal a certain degree of reliability across utilization points, scale, and contexts. An essential attribute of any empirical pursuit.

The efficiently designed Protocols of Equal can account for all matters relating to equality via one coherent structure. It’s a formula whereas the core components of the POE can be substituted by variables. For example, variable place holders can be used for conduits of equality, and their occurrences. Empowering the POE to account for, and quantify nearly every conduit, or occurrence that could ever be associated with equality, or inequality with the same formula.

To reiterate, the POE is constructed of Elegant architecture that makes the application of equality efficient yet dynamic. A foundational, reliable, stable long term basis that can potentially unify equality under one scalable framework. The next phase is to put the POE through the empirical rigors, to validate if its ambitious equality objectives can be substantiated.

The primary empirical tasks are:

Analyze, comprehend, and document the correlations associated with the foundations of equality constructs.
Next, analyze, comprehend and document the correlations associated with the interactions between equality constructs.
Then, devise reliable, repeatable, quantifiable methods, and actionable protocols that oversee the operation and interaction of equality constructs.
Accordingly, establish a reliable foundational framework that can deliver actionable protocols across many contexts within society. This includes multiple entities and sectors.
Finally, construct complex data driven equality frameworks to monitor and improve the function of the POE within society.

If significant portions of the POE’s framework are proven to possess reliable, repeatable processes with verifiable correlations, it could potentially signal the making of a theory. Ideally the goal is to achieve Extremely High Level Equality (EHLEQ). If this is achieved at a satisfactory level, the POE Framework could potentially evolve from a complex group of interconnected theses, into a scientific theory.

Take a closer look! See if the Protocols of Equal is a scientific theory in the making. If it is, then it could significantly improve the experience, and livelihood of all equality striving individuals across the planet. A history making feat.

Archives

Categories