The majority rules. But is this ruler-ship equitable?
DEFINITION
An individual ideology multiplied into a unified collective.
EXPLANATION
| CLARIFICATIONS The intent of a Collective Consensus could be equal or unequal. While an equitable consensus upkeep the Rule Of Sow And Reap (ROSAR), an inequity based consensus does not. |
| EXEMPLIFICATIONS When the Collective Consensus is driven by inequities decisively equitable approaches are either: 1. Not Acknowledged (AFTB) 2. Hindered (Silent Red Tape, Abetting Via Ignorance, Ignorance Until Affected and similar principles) 3. Denied In this case, the supporters of an equitable consensus, can and usually face alienation, and potentially x-communication; more commonly known as “cancellation”. Both of which have different degrees of severity. Conversely, when the Collective Consensus is equitable, inequity is usually: 1. Prevented 2. Reversed (When detected) An equitable Collective Consensus is an ideal environment. It provides an environment of fertile soil for equitable growth. Something that is required for a fulfilling experience in society along with a higher standard of living. |
| AFFIRMATIONS A Collective Consensus exemplifies the predominant thought and intent of a particular assembly. |
| CONSIDERATIONS Perhaps, the Collective Consensus could affect the Collective Unconscious of its member individuals. Something that would require a study of its own. |
THESIS
The equitable composition and conduct of a Collective Consensus provides a strong indication of how moral it is along with its individuals.
EQUAL ADVANCED RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (EARD) OBJECTIVES
- Identify and quantify the parameters of Collective Consensus.
- Identify and quantify the factors that surround the formation of a Collective Consensus.
- Establish effective methods to improve the equability of Collective Consensus.
TECHNICAL WRITING BY:
D S Reid