A requirement for utilitarianism to be truly valid.
DEFINITION
The application of utilitarianism without the Omnipresence Of Sow And Reap.
EXPLANATION
| CLARIFICATIONS Every person must have an equated basis to equally sow and reap for utilitarianism to be truly valid. |
| EXEMPLIFICATIONS Otherwise, its moral benefits become negated as the basis of what is good, and who the many are, is skewed. The concept of ‘Greater good’ does not guarantee the higher, more refined principle of ‘Equal share’. |
| AFFIRMATIONS Accurately accounting for the voice of the people first requires the implementation of the Omnipresence of Sow And Reap principle. |
| CONSIDERATIONS The lower tiers often receive very little of the so-called ‘Common good’. Yet, they are frequently the ones most impacted. In addition, they often do not get to equally sow and reap, and consequently do not have as much resources. Thus further negating any claims of mutual benefits. True utilitarianism is rarely achieved. This exemplifies how faulty the concept of ‘suits and systems’ is, especially for formal systems. False utilitarianism is a major reason why formal systems are inefficient in achieving equality. Earnest declarations to serve ‘The People’ for a ‘Greater good’ do exist. However, accurately accounting for the voice of the people first requires the implementation of the Omnipresence of Sow And Reap principle. This must be applied at a root foundational level, with built in safeguards and checkpoints. |
THESIS
False utilitarianism is a major reason why formal systems are inefficient in achieving equality.
EQUAL ADVANCED RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (EARD) OBJECTIVES
- Identify and quantify the parameters of False Utilitarianism.
- Identify and quantify the causes, effects of False Utilitarianism.
- Identify and apply effective measures to solve and prevent False Utilitarianism.
TECHNICAL WRITING BY:
D S Reid