Sustaining or negating human livelihood
DEFINITION
The point of intersection where human livelihood is either sustained or negated.
EXPLANATION
| CLARIFICATIONS For this observation, sustaining human livelihood is referred to as, “Sustaining the human threshold”; while negating human livelihood is referred to as, “Negating the human threshold” |
| EXEMPLIFICATIONS Without physical conflict it’s not easy to negate the human threshold. However, there is a certain number ratio where this becomes likely. For example, 5 to 1, 20 to 1, or even 100 to 1. The average human has a relatively similar amount of personal strength (mental or physical), plus or minus a given percentage. Inequality leverages the thoughts, feelings, and actions of many unequal people against a lesser number of people, usually a relative few, or often 1 person. As the leverage increases, the human livelihood becomes more negated, and cessation of life could transpire. |
| AFFIRMATIONS Sustaining the human threshold is vital for well being. It’s possible many ailments are due to the occurrence of leveraged inequities that break the human threshold. Identifying and quantifying what breaks the human threshold is vital to upkeep any claims of equality. |
| CONSIDERATIONS N/A |
THESIS
There is a strong correlation between inequities that negate the human threshold and the well being of an individual.
EQUAL ADVANCED RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (EARD) OBJECTIVES
- Identify and quantify the parameters of the human threshold.
- Identify and quantify the factors that break the human threshold.
- Identify and develop reliable methods to protect the human threshold.
TECHNICAL WRITING BY:
D S Reid