Is there such a thing as a hypocrite at arms?
DEFINITION
Asserting arms while avoiding reciprocal treatment.
CLARIFICATIONS Without the potential for reciprocal treatment, the moral integrity of arms enforcement is likely compromised. Especially if arms are applied without invoking the Power Of Solution clause. |
EXEMPLIFICATIONS It’s unjust for the enforcer to persecute a person for circumstances that can not be reasonably prevented by either the enforcer nor the person(s) involved. Especially if the enforcer can not solve the root cause of the conflict themselves. Thus, the arms enforcer is guilty of Arms Hypocrisy. A major violation of equality. The Best A Human Could Do (BAHCD) principle should be applied to preserve equality. Arms Hypocrisy must be eradicated as it only defends the problem, along with its corresponding causes and effects. Once the Power Of Solution clause is applied, the subject of enforcement could still be deemed accountable for some, or all of the transgressions in question. However, willful cause or negligence must be proven on their part. |
AFFIRMATIONS Arms Hypocrisy does occur at a significant rate. Oftentimes it is preventable. Eradicating Arms Hypocrisy is crucial to amend the ‘Word of equal’. |
CONSIDERATIONS It should be noted. Some countries have constitutional support for equality. The formal arms of these countries are expected to uphold equal arms as it is their stated intent. However, informal arms are rife with hypocritical behaviors, as they are mostly personally motivated and operated. Arms Hypocrisy is deemed as an expected part of informal arms. Equally capable counter arms usually act a deterrent. Sadly, influence at arms is usually the accepted mode of adjudication for hypocritical matters. Especially within formal environments. Offensive prowess is the major determinant of enforcement, for informal environments. Although formal arms have a better track record than informal arms where hypocrisy is concerned, there have been countless inquiries to questionable hypocritical occurrences against the stated ‘equal intent’. This is partially due to the incongruent application, inefficiently design of policies and procedures, and in some cases negligence. |
EXPLANATION
THESIS
Terminating Arms Hypocrisy is mandatory to prevent inequalities.
EQUAL ADVANCED RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (EARD) OBJECTIVES
- Identify and quantify the parameters of Arms Hypocrisy.
- Identify and quantify methods to detect the presence of Arms Hypocrisy.
- Identify and quantify methods to reverse the presence of Arms Hypocrisy.
- Identify and quantify methods to prevent Arms Hypocrisy.
TECHNICAL WRITING BY:
D S Reid